CILE
Area of Research
Invitation to Public Lecture: “When Fiqh and Ethics are Disconnected: ISIS as an Example” 16/02/2015

The Research Center for Islamic Legislation and Ethics (CILE) cordially invites you to attend a public lecture: “When Fiqh and Ethics are Disconnected: ISIS as an Example”. The event will be held on Monday, 16th February 2015, 7:00 – 9:00pm at Auditorium in the new building of Qatar Faculty of Islamic Studies. Dr Mu’taz Al-Khateeb, Assistant Prof of Methodology and Ethics in CILE, will give this lecture.

This lecture will analyze the organization of the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS) with reference to its origins and evaluation as well as its intellectual framework and ideology. The lecturer approaches this issue by highlighting the original texts in Qur’an and Sunna, the current different discourses of jihad and Questions in regard to jurisprudence-Fikh- and ethics. The consequences of the current developments on the international context especially with regard to Islamic World will also be discussed. Dr Al-Khateeb will focus on examining the interrelation between text and context in the behavior and practices of Islamic State Organization.

 

ISIS Lecture - EN@2x

 

 

Location Map :

 

 

 

Post your Comments

Your email address will not be published*

Comments

To my mind the most critical question, from a normative perspective, that to me as a Muslim is very important is this : If we use the concept of 'reasonableness' as an epistemic cum hermeneutical category to evaluate ISIS interpretation of Islam ( which is ahl-hadith salafi manhaj) , can we say that is it reasonable viz a viz the majority /mainstream view ( based on madhhab based approach) ? My answer to this question , as much as it pains me, is yes (for reasons that I discuss in my book). I would LOVE to be proven wrong. I think there is an understandable tendency to disassociate oneself from ISIS and one way to do it is to exaggerate the manhaj based differences between neo-madhhab based manhaj and that of ahl-hadith based manhaj ( which ISIS represents) that is just not warranted by examination of evidence, especially in relation to hudud and gender relations. this does not mean that contemporary proponents of madhahb based manhaj endorse the kind of means justifies the ends logic operative ISIS and their approach to jihad ( in sense of warfare- i am aware of the 600 page rebuttal of extremists concept of jihad by that Malasian Oxford scholar whose name escapes me). What I am trying to say is this: because classical madhhab mahaj ( as described in my book) is the what it is , it makes the ISI manhaj 'reasonable' . by contrast if measured against ,progressive madhhab based manhaj ( as decribed in my book) , SISI manhaj would be very much unreasonable . What I sincerley hope is that the emergence of ISIS type of interpretations will be a wake up call for those who uncritically uphold madhhab based manhaj and finally understand the merits of reformist scholars like Abu Zayd, Hassan Hanafi, AK Soroush, Abdulaziz Sachedina, Mohsen Kadivar, Abou EL Fadl, Ebrahim Moosa , M. Shahrour , M . Talbi, M. AL Jabiri, Al-Marzuki , Fzrul Rahman, Y.Eshkevari , Ali Ashgar Engineer , feminist Muslim women ( Asma BAralas, Amina Wadud, Keci Ali ) who have been exposing the loss of 'resonableness' of classical madhahb manhaj in the context of a modern espiteme condition for a very long time !

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.